Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

Have you ever walked into a store because you saw a sale advertised, only to find out that the sale wasn’t quite what you thought it was?
That recently happened to my wife and I during Labor Day weekend. What was supposed to be a casual shopping trip turned into an experience that left me questioning how some stores advertise their promotions and whether customers are really getting the deal they think they are getting.
In this case, the store was Rack Room Shoes, and the promotion we saw was a BOGO 50% off deal.
At least, that’s what we thought it meant.
After our experience, I couldn’t help but ask myself: Was I being unreasonable, or was this promotion misleading?
During Labor Day weekend, my wife and I decided to go shopping. There wasn’t anything particularly special about the trip. We were simply out enjoying the weekend and looking around at different stores.
My wife had been wanting a new pair of shoes for a while, so naturally, we ended up stopping at a shoe store.
While walking around the store, we noticed a sign advertising a BOGO promotion that said the second pair was 50% off.
To me, that seemed pretty straightforward.
BOGO generally means “buy one, get one,” and when you see “50% off the second pair,” the natural assumption is that if you purchase two qualifying pairs of shoes, the second pair will be half price.
So we started looking.
My wife found a pair she liked, and we continued looking around to see if there was another pair that would make sense to purchase.
After all, if we were going to buy two pairs anyway, getting the second pair for half price seemed like a reasonable deal.
We weren’t trying to take advantage of the promotion. We weren’t looking for some loophole. We simply thought we were taking advantage of the sale that was being advertised.
Eventually, we found two pairs that we were interested in purchasing and headed toward the register.
This is where things got interesting.
When the employee rang up the shoes, both pairs were charged at full price.
I immediately noticed that the discount wasn’t showing up.
So I asked the employee a simple question:
“Isn’t the second pair supposed to be 50% off?”
The employee explained that only certain shoes were eligible for the promotion.
Apparently, the customer was supposed to look for a specific tag indicating that the shoe qualified for the 50% discount.
That was news to us.
Neither my wife nor I had understood that only certain products were eligible. The large BOGO promotion had caught our attention, but we didn’t realize that we needed to individually inspect every pair of shoes to determine whether it qualified.
At that point, we had a decision to make.
By this point, we had already spent quite a bit of time looking for shoes.
Anyone who has gone shopping for shoes knows that finding the right pair isn’t always as easy as it sounds.
You have to find something you like, find the correct size, try them on, decide whether they’re comfortable, compare them with other options, and then determine whether you’re actually willing to spend the money.
We had already gone through that process.
But once we discovered that the two pairs we selected weren’t eligible for the promotion, the deal no longer made sense to us.
So we decided to purchase only one pair.
And honestly, I didn’t feel great about the experience.
This is where I started thinking about the whole situation.
Was Rack Room Shoes technically violating its promotion?
Probably not, assuming the terms of the promotion clearly stated that only certain products were eligible and the qualifying products were properly marked.
But that’s not really the point.
The bigger issue for me was how the promotion was presented to customers.
If a store advertises “Buy One, Get One 50% Off,” I think the average customer is going to assume that most of the products they’re looking at qualify unless there are very obvious restrictions.
If only certain shoes qualify, I believe that limitation should be extremely clear.
Imagine walking into a store and seeing a giant sign that says:
BUY ONE, GET ONE 50% OFF
You find two pairs of shoes you like, spend 30 or 45 minutes shopping, and then get to the register only to discover that neither pair qualifies.
That can be frustrating.
And it makes me wonder how many customers don’t notice until they’re at the register.
I don’t know whether this is intentionally done to get customers into the store, and I don’t want to claim that it is.
However, as a consumer, I couldn’t help but wonder about it.
Sales and promotions are obviously designed to attract customers. That’s nothing unusual. Every retailer uses promotions to encourage people to visit their stores.
But there is a big difference between attracting customers with a genuinely useful promotion and attracting them with a promotion that customers may misunderstand.
If I had known before walking into the store that the majority of the shoes I was interested in weren’t eligible for the 50% discount, I might not have gone inside in the first place.
That’s what bothered me the most.
We didn’t walk into the store randomly and then happen to discover a promotion.
The promotion itself was one of the reasons we were interested in shopping there.
There is another interesting part of this experience.
Once you’ve spent 30 minutes or more looking for something, you become invested in the purchase.
You’ve already spent time browsing.
You’ve found something you like.
You’ve tried it on.
Maybe you’ve compared several different pairs.
You’re finally standing at the register.
Then you find out the promotion doesn’t apply.
What do you do?
Some people will simply pay full price.
They’ve already invested the time, and they don’t want to start the shopping process all over again somewhere else.
Others may decide to buy one item instead, like we did.
And some people will simply walk away.
I decided that I didn’t want to pay full price for both pairs when I specifically came into the store thinking there was a promotion on the second pair.
So we purchased one pair and left.
Now, someone could argue that this is simply how promotions work.
And that’s fair.
Stores frequently have exclusions. Certain brands may be excluded. Certain styles may be excluded. Clearance items may be excluded. The promotion may apply only to selected merchandise.
That’s nothing new.
As consumers, we also have some responsibility to read the details.
But there is a difference between reading the fine print and having a promotion that creates an expectation that isn’t met for the products most customers are looking at.
If the promotion is “50% off the second pair on select shoes,” that is a different message from simply saying “50% off the second pair.”
Those extra words matter.
The more restrictive the promotion, the more important it is to make those restrictions obvious.
My biggest complaint isn’t necessarily that the store had exclusions.
My complaint is that I didn’t understand the exclusions until I was standing at the register.
If the shoes we were looking at had a very obvious sign saying “Not eligible for BOGO promotion,” we probably would have understood.
Or if the main promotional sign clearly stated that the offer applied only to specifically marked shoes, we could have made an informed decision before spending time shopping.
Instead, we saw the BOGO promotion, assumed the shoes qualified, and only found out otherwise when we were ready to pay.
That’s not the shopping experience I expected.
For us, this experience changed how we view the store.
Maybe some people would say we’re overreacting.
Maybe they would say that every retailer has promotional exclusions and we should have read the terms more carefully.
That’s their opinion.
For me, however, shopping is about more than simply finding the lowest price.
It’s also about trust.
When I see a promotion, I want to feel confident that I understand what I’m getting.
I don’t want to spend a significant amount of time shopping and then discover at the register that the promotion doesn’t apply to what I selected.
Because of this experience, my wife and I decided that we probably won’t be returning to Rack Room Shoes.
There are plenty of other places to buy shoes, and I’d rather shop somewhere where I feel the promotions are straightforward and easy to understand.
This experience also reminded me of an important shopping lesson:
Never assume that a sale applies to everything in the store.
Even when a promotion seems obvious, it’s worth checking the details.
Look for qualifying tags.
Ask an employee before spending 30 minutes shopping.
Read the promotional terms.
And, most importantly, don’t feel pressured to purchase something just because you’ve already spent time shopping for it.
If the price isn’t what you expected, you’re allowed to walk away.
That’s exactly what we did.
There is also a lesson here for retailers.
If you’re going to advertise a promotion, make the terms obvious.
Don’t make customers feel like they were tricked into walking into the store.
Again, I can’t say that was Rack Room Shoes’ intention. Perhaps the company clearly explains the promotion elsewhere, and perhaps the qualifying tags are obvious to customers who know what to look for.
But from our perspective, the promotion wasn’t clear.
And perception matters.
A customer who feels like a promotion wasn’t straightforward may not come back, regardless of whether the promotion technically followed its terms.
Retailers spend a lot of money trying to get customers through the door.
It doesn’t make much sense to potentially lose that customer because the promotion wasn’t clear enough.
So, was I scammed?
Technically, I don’t know that I can say that I was.
If the promotion’s terms clearly stated that only selected shoes qualified and the store properly marked those shoes, then the store may have simply been following its promotion.
But as a customer, I certainly felt misled by what I thought the promotion meant.
And that’s the important distinction.
A promotion can technically have restrictions while still leaving customers with a different impression from what they initially saw.
In our case, we expected the second pair to be 50% off. When we discovered that wasn’t the case for the shoes we selected, we changed our minds.
We bought one pair and left.
And perhaps that’s the biggest lesson of all.
A sale isn’t really a sale to me if I have to figure out after shopping whether I actually qualified for it.
Going forward, I’ll pay much closer attention to the promotional signs and qualifying tags before spending time shopping.
And when a store advertises a BOGO deal, I’ll make sure I know exactly what “BOGO” actually means before I start filling up the shopping basket.
Because at the end of the day, clear pricing and honest communication are worth more to me than a flashy sale sign.